Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone: Chapter Eleven

19 Jan

Well, sad news aside, life must go on. And unfortunately we’re at the point in the book where going on involves yet more bloody Quidditch. This chapter took a while to do despite it being one of the shortest because frankly we were both glad of any excuse to be sidetracked.

 Chapter Eleven: Quidditch
Today’s picture: it’s raining… Quidditch players?

We’re into November now, and the weather has finally turned cold. Pretty sure it would have been snowing for a while by this point, honestly, but some years are more extreme than others, so whatever. Hagrid can be seen out of the windows defrosting broomsticks – it’s implied this happens every morning, or at least very frequently. Inevitably for the first paragraph of a chapter, there are quite a few things wrong with this. Why do the brooms need defrosting? Why are they being stored out in the open where they will get frosted over, and why would this actually matter? Why does he need to do it so often when most of the time they’re not being used? I know the school must be desperate to invent things for Hagrid to do, since his job is pointless, but even so.

He’s also wearing a rather bizarre collection of furs: ‘a long moleskin overcoat, rabbit-fur gloves and enormous beaverskin boots.‘ Again, this raises a few issues, quite apart from the moral objections (we should probably have been keeping a tally of gratuitous animal cruelty in these books, honestly, but it’s too late now). First, where did Hagrid get the furs from? I can’t see trappers, tanners and furriers being traditional wizarding trades. Did he go and hunt for them himself? Finding beavers must have been a bit of a challenge in that case, since they’ve only been reintroduced to Britain in the past few years, and I can’t imagine how many moles you’d have to kill to get enough fur for a long coat for someone Hagrid’s size. Plus how does he know how to turn animal skins into preserved furs to work with?

The main reason this is stupid, though, is that fur just isn’t all that great at keeping people warm. We’d still be using it for winter clothing if it was, instead of just decoration. And if you really insist on using fur, you wouldn’t use moles. They have barely any fur and it’s certainly not going to keep you warm, it’s more like velvet than anything. You’d want wolf or bear, or reindeer; wolverine if you can find it. But no matter what fur you use, synthetic Muggle fabrics are just plain better. And someone somewhere must be sourcing cloth from the Muggle world, because again, I can’t see wizards growing cotton/raising and shearing sheep/working in factories to produce it.

My personal theory for how the wizarding world operates (which I think I’ve mentioned before) is that somewhere on the planet, probably somewhere like the Bermuda Triangle, there are vast industrial estates and farms that produce all their material goods like food, cloth, timber, equipment etc. The reason the wizard population seems so small is that more than half of them are all working mundane Muggle-esque industrial jobs in these vast farms. The world we see, of Hogwarts and Diagon Alley and so on, is just the upper-class tip of the iceberg. Because nothing else makes any sense.

I told you we were eager to be sidetracked.

Harry’s due to play in his first-ever Quidditch match, inevitably against Slytherin. Nobody’s seen Harry play because Wood’s decided to keep his ace in the hole a secret. This is because Wood is a moron, and because the seeker is a stupid role. Clearly the seeker isn’t part of the team, or he’d be practising with the team during their assigned training sessions. Unless his team-mates aren’t included in this, and it’s just that nobody else has seen him? Ordinarily this would be sensible because nobody not on the team would be remotely interested in watching them train, but given how the school occasionally reacts to Harry whenever they remember, it’s unlikely. And given how seriously everyone takes this stupid sport, the other teams should want to check out the new competition, even though they should take one look at his broom and realise they can’t win and not bother. Also, the Quidditch pitch must be visible from the school itself, and the teams have to book the pitch to practice. You haven’t kept it a secret at all, mate, people just don’t care.

‘But the news that he was playing Seeker had leaked out somehow.’ Gosh, you don’t say. Fancy that. It’s almost as if the entire school witnessed him being sent a suspicious broom-shaped parcel and put two and two together, isn’t it. Egad, Holmes.

People are either telling Harry he’ll be brilliant (inevitably) or telling him they’ll run around under him with a mattress; Harry’s not sure which is worse. Er, neither of them, Harry – both those types of people are on your side. You ought to be pleased some of them are suggesting they’ll try to stop you dying horribly. Of course, this is actually meant to just be mockery implying he’s bad and will fall off, but seriously, someone with a mattress would be better than nothing and suggesting you’re going to try to save someone isn’t terribly insulting. Not much better, admittedly, depending on the mattress – do we think the wizarding world has reached the point of modern mattresses (invented somewhere around 1900), or are theirs still stuffed with straw or horse hair or something? Maybe they’re the sentient mattresses from The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

Harry thinks he’s really lucky to be friends with Hermione now, because he’d never get through all his homework by himself with all this training going on. It’s not outright stated that she’s doing it for him, and we’ll see throughout the series that she does make token attempts to try to make them do at least some of it themselves, but… yeah. What’s more, all the teachers must know Harry’s going to have a lot of extra-curricular stuff to do and must realise he’s likely getting help with his homework (plus if Hermione’s helping his marks have just shot up) and they’re just letting it happen. Teachers usually do tend to notice when student papers are suspiciously similar, especially when the class sizes are as small as Hogwarts is implied to be; are we really meant to believe none of them ever pick up on this?

I’m concluding that Hermione is really desperate for friends. Or alternatively, since she’s secretly best friends with Neville, she’s bribing Harry (and Ron) so they won’t pick on her any more.

She’s also lent Harry Quidditch Through the Ages, which Harry magnanimously allows is actually very interesting (supposedly). He learns there are over seven hundred ways to commit a foul, though most of them aren’t possible without wands, which are banned. I find this unlikely, although we’re told every last one of them happened during one match in the 1400s, but in any case, while the ‘actual’ book mentions this number it only lists ten. Apparently the full list isn’t available to the public in case it gives anyone ideas (haha, witness Rowling desperately fishing for an excuse to avoid coming up with them) – basically there’s no way to avoid breaking the rules because nobody will tell you what the rules are. Much like Hogwarts itself. Seekers are usually the smallest and fastest players, and the worst accidents usually happen to them, BECAUSE HARRY’S REALLY FUCKING SPECIAL HAVE YOU GOT THAT YET? People usually don’t die outright, but they do sometimes vanish and show up months later in the Sahara Desert or something.

That would kill most people, wizards or not. Apparating is difficult and it’s apparently quite common for people not to master it, not to mention that most of the Hogwarts kids haven’t even been told it exists yet. Even assuming their brooms go with them when this happens, unless you know where you are and which direction you need to fly to get to the nearest magical community with owls to tell people where the hell you are, you’re going to die unless it’s possible to create a Portkey on the fly when you probably don’t have your wand. Wizards have a spell to create water (laws of physics, what laws of physics?) but we’re explicitly told later they cannot create food. Cooling charms are a thing and could probably be used to avoid heatstroke, plus warming charms at night; but although I’m sure there is an anti-sunburn charm of some kind, what are the odds of a random Quidditch player knowing it and being able to do it wandlessly?

Anyway. Hermione’s apparently more relaxed about breaking rules since the troll incident (new theory, she was hurt in that fight and has sustained some sort of temporary brain damage, or is just faking it so the boys will be less horrible to her. While it’s more or less true for most of the rest of this book, it’s not really in character and she shakes it off before next book) and Harry says she’s ‘much nicer‘ as a result. Because what makes someone nice isn’t their personality, it’s whether they’ll let you do whatever you want or not. Charming.

She’s also continuing to be the only character capable of magic on a regular basis, since during a particularly cold break she conjures up some bright blue flames in a jar for the three of them to huddle around for warmth. This seems excessively complicated since warming charms are a thing, or if it’s that cold they could just stay inside, and where did the jam jar come from, and how are they holding the jar without getting burned? It still sounds cool though.

Current spell count: Hermione, 4 (presumably she had to Transfigure the jar as well). Ron, 1. Harry, 0. Someone suggested we track this, and since it makes Harry look useless and Hermione look awesome I’m happy to oblige.

Snape shows up completely at random and approaches them; Harry notices he’s limping. I have no idea why he’s here. Does Hogwarts really make him supervise breaks in addition to everything else he has to do? Is there any reason why Rowling couldn’t have worked this scene into a Potions lesson? He says library books aren’t allowed outside the school building and takes the Quidditch book away from Harry, along with five points. Harry says afterwards that he thinks Snape’s just made that rule up, but given that nobody’s told Harry any of the rules I don’t know how he’d know that. It also seems quite a sensible rule to me, given the presence of mud and puddles and snow and the freaking lake.

The point of this random little scene was for Harry to then decide to go to the staff room later to ask for his book back, because he’s about to see something plot-relevant. Snape didn’t need to be involved, Harry could have been going to talk to another teacher – maybe to ask for an extension on his homework so Hermione wouldn’t have to ‘help’ so much – or could even just be passing an empty room and overheard voices. We’re about to see why Snape was limping so telling us earlier that he was limping isn’t important. And there is no reason on this earth why what Harry’s about to see would be taking place in the staff room, seriously. Where are all the other teachers?

I’d also like to point out that this is Friday evening, since tomorrow is Saturday morning and the Quidditch match. We know Harry has Potions on Fridays. Why wouldn’t he have just asked about the book after his lesson? And are we really meant to believe Snape taught lessons with the injury we’re about to see?

And while I’m pointing out stupid things, why is it Harry asking for the book back? Hermione lent it to him. It’s her library book. She should be the one going to ask for it back, because she’s going to be the one in trouble for not returning it to the library if Snape doesn’t let them have it back. This is why multiple characters should have POV scenes. I know Harry is a very special snowflake, but he shouldn’t be doing everything and there are some things that just have nothing to do with him.

Harry sees Filch and Snape in the implausibly empty staff room, after they implausibly don’t hear him knocking twice and he opens the door to have a look. Snape is holding his robes out of the way of his ‘bloody and mangled‘ leg while Filch hands him bandages, and he’s also talking about how hard it is ‘to keep your eyes on all three heads at once‘. He notices Harry and shouts at him to get out, and Harry sensibly does so.

(Incidentally, there’s no indication here that Snape is wearing trousers. Um, draw your own conclusions for that one. Random old guys at Quidditch games in Book 4 notwithstanding, Britain is not a climate where any population can possibly evolve not wearing anything under loose robes, even if they weren’t all having to stay vaguely in line with Muggle fashions to avoid standing out as much as the stupider wizards do. Yes, kilts are traditional Scottish dress, but seriously, it’s way too damned cold for that. Let’s assume Fluffy ripped the relevant part of the trouser leg off, shall we?)

So let’s review, as he tells Ron and Hermione what he thinks happened. According to Harry, Snape tried to get past Fluffy on Halloween, several days ago, and was bitten for his troubles and gave up; Snape must therefore have been trying to get to whatever Fluffy is guarding, and therefore must have let the troll in as a diversion. Apparently Snape then didn’t bother trying to heal his leg, and left it for several days during which time nobody noticed him limping (or, you know, leaving a trail of blood behind him), before the pain got too much for him. He then enlisted one of only two people in the whole school incapable of using magic to help him and began to treat said injury in the staff room in the middle of the afternoon, and somehow only Harry saw.

This is beyond stupid.

There was no mention during the aftermath of the troll fight that Snape was hurt, and if his leg was literally mangled it would have been very noticeable – his clothes would have been shredded, he would have been bleeding badly and he would have been limping very obviously, assuming he could walk at all after being mauled by a giant dog. There is a great deal of difference just between being nipped by accident while playing with a friendly dog and being bitten by a scared dog who is trying to warn you off, let alone being genuinely attacked by an angry dog that really wants to bite you. Even little inbred rat dogs still have more or less the same dental structure as a wolf, and their teeth cause a lot of damage unless they’ve been bred to have no proper jaws.

Snape is also not an idiot and wouldn’t have just left it untreated (headcanons regarding depression notwithstanding) and we see several times over the series that he’s a decent healer who can fix complicated shit nobody else knows how to deal with. Also, he’s a spy and double agent – no matter how badly he’s been hurt, he’s not going to visibly limp unless he wants someone to see it or unless there’s nobody to see it.

To make sense of the timeline, we need to assume that although Snape did go to the third floor on Halloween – to head Quirrell off, as we’re told later in the book – he wasn’t attacked then. We also need to ignore Harry noticing him limping this morning, and assume that was for a different reason – walking carefully because of the ice, or an old injury aching in the cold, or something else that Harry misinterpreted. Because this sounds like a fresh attack, as though he’s only just been bitten. (Either that or he’s been bleeding for days, which… no.) So he’s gone back to the third floor again, and this time has gone inside. We know he had no reason to do that – it’s the middle of the day, Quirrell won’t have done anything that needs checking up on; he knows what Fluffy’s guarding and isn’t after it himself. Maybe there’s a staff rota for having to feed and clean up after Fluffy, and Snape just happened to be unlucky today and was bitten because the poor dog is getting very temperamental after being confined for months. We can also assume that Filch may have been in the area and wanted to help, and since Snape probably knows about Muggle healing and doesn’t really want to go to the nurse to get it fixed anyway and also probably isn’t horrible to Filch he may have agreed.

There is still no explanation for why they’re using the staff room, or why nobody else is in there, or why they didn’t hear Harry knock. Unless there were other staff there? Harry only nudged the door far enough ajar to see Snape and Filch, he didn’t see the whole room. If there were other teachers there, maybe they were taking an interest in the novel Muggle idea of using bandages, and wanted to see what could potentially happen to them if they get bitten when it’s their turn to look after the dog. Maybe they didn’t answer the door to Harry because they were assuming a student would take the hint and fuck off when nobody let them in.

In any case, we know none of this is what happened, because every time this incident is mentioned throughout the series, the narrative insists that of course Harry’s version is correct. This means that at this point Rowling still had Snape cast as the villain, and also thought he was REALLY FUCKING STUPID. The only other possible explanation, if we accept the book’s insistence that Harry’s not an unreliable narrator at all, is that Snape is deliberately setting himself up to take the blame. This does make sense of everything, but leaves unanswered the question of why on earth he’d bother. It would take Dumbledore’s direct order to make him do it, and I don’t see what purpose that would serve. Of course there’s always the chance that Dumbles is just doing it for the lulz, which is entirely too plausible, but still.

Ron believes Harry’s version without question, of course. Hermione is more sceptical, though not because she realises it’s all nonsense – after all, she only has Harry’s account to go on – but because she simply doesn’t think Snape would do that. ‘I know he’s not very nice, but he wouldn’t try and steal something Dumbledore was keeping safe.’ This is both absolutely true and yet utterly naive of her. No matter what she’s read that insists Dumbles is super-amazing, by this point she must have seen that he doesn’t do anything except sit on his throne during meals and say stupid things every now and then. Why would anyone be afraid to cross him? At this point in the series he’s just another staff member.

I could easily forgive Harry being an unreliable narrator. He’s just a kid at this point, and as we’ll see throughout the series he often jumps to conclusions when he doesn’t have all the facts or doesn’t want to get all the facts. Particularly where Snape’s concerned. And his theory does make sense if you don’t know what’s really going on. But he’s not treated as an unreliable narrator; even though he’s wrong, the book retcons history to say he was right, and will keep on doing so for all seven books.

They can’t discuss it any further, since they still have no idea what Fluffy’s guarding and therefore don’t know what the stakes are. That’s still no excuse for jumping into Quidditch again, book. It’s now the morning of the match, and Harry is bricking it. Much as I hate Quidditch and everything it represents, I do like his reaction here; there’s no unnecessary melodrama, he genuinely comes across as anxious. He’s too nauseous to eat breakfast, despite Hermione ‘wheedl[ing]‘ to try and persuade him (this is almost as bad as nagging. Don’t do it). Seamus agrees with her that he should eat, though since he’s not a silly nurturing female he doesn’t get insulted by the narrative for it, and helpfully tells Harry that seekers are most likely to get hurt and he’ll need his strength.

The match is due to start at 11. Apparently the whole school has piled into the stadium, of course. A lot of them have binoculars – not the magic ones we’ll see in book four; just ordinary Muggle ones. Seriously, why does Rowling decide in later books that wizards don’t know anything about the Muggle world and don’t use Muggle inventions? That said, binoculars are pretty useless for watching anything moving fast over a wide area.

Ron, Hermione, Neville, Seamus and Dean are all sitting on the top row. I’ve no idea where the other Gryffindor girls are. They’ve made a banner out of a sheet that Scabbers chewed (good to know Scabbers is alive, but the sheet would have been removed and mended; let’s be charitable and assume they asked permission).

‘It said Potter for President and Dean, who was good at drawing, had done a large Gryffindor lion underneath. Then Hermione had performed a tricky little charm so that the paint flashed different colours.’

I like Dean being good at art. I think this is pretty much the only time art is acknowledged to exist, at least until we meet Luna who is mocked for making her own clothes and jewellery. I do wonder what sort of books Hermione’s been reading that have this sort of basically useless charm listed, though – one assumes she’s just blazing through the entire school library and has already learned all the good spells.

Current spell count: Hermione, 5. Ron, 1. Harry, 0.

[Mitchell adds: we actually got a bit sidetracked here wondering whether ‘So-and-so for President’ was the sort of thing British children would be likely to say. I thought it rather peculiar and probably an American cultural export, but Loten assures me that it isn’t necessarily so, and the title of ‘president’ is still around even if it isn’t a major political figure. That said, I still think it’s a bit of an odd choice and suspect Rowling just wanted the alliteration.]

Most of this chapter is omniscient-narrator, since Harry’s taking part in the match and unable to see or hear what’s happening in the crowd. That’s fair enough, but I wish more of the book were this way. Ignoring my personal view of Harry as a narrator, though, this is the first Quidditch match we ever see, and Quidditch is pretty much Harry’s only hobby; he’s not interested in anything else. I personally would find his POV of the match insanely tedious, but it would be important to his character, and he could quite easily be narrating up until things start going wrong and we cut to what’s happening in the stadium. Again, multiple characters having point-of-view scenes would help; instead, the narration of this chapter comes off as weirdly detached and lifeless a lot of the time.

Harry’s getting changed with the rest of the team when Wood tries to make a speech. (Incidentally, there’s no description of Quidditch robes beyond their colour. I would imagine they’d need to be divided, like riding dresses were until side-saddle was invented, because otherwise you’d have to bunch them up around your waist to sit astride a broomstick and that rather defeats the point of a robe.) The ‘speech’ is taken over by the Terrible Twins and one of the other players, Angelina Johnson, who were all on the team in previous years and have it memorised; it’s not much of a speech, but Wood’s only fifteen or sixteen.

All three Gryffindor chasers are girls. Hurray, diversity! Though one of them, Alicia Spinnet, won’t appear again that I can recall. Angelina Johnson and Katie Bell both have small recurring parts until at least book six, but I can’t remember Alicia showing up again. There don’t seem to be any girls on the Slytherin team, but there also don’t seem to be any purebloods with silly names, going by the names we hear throughout the match – Marcus and Adrian sort of echo the Roman theme a lot of families seem to have, but we also have Terence and other unremarkable names. In a house containing students saddled with, amongst others, Draco, Lucius, Narcissa, Bellatrix, Rodolphus, Rabastan, Alecto, Andromeda, Astoria, Blaise, and of course Severus. Admittedly, most of them don’t exist at this point in the series, in which case I wonder why Rowling decided later to give half of them outlandish names. At the moment most of them are pretty normal.

Anyway, Madam Hooch the useless substitute teacher is refereeing, and tells both teams she doesn’t want them to cheat. I would have thought that went without saying, personally. Of course Harry decides she’s mostly talking to the Slytherin captain, Marcus Flint. Marcus is a fifth year, but this will be retconned in later books because Rowling forgot when he should have graduated and ends up saying he had to repeat a year; this seems to be a fairly well known thing in America and possibly in other countries, but I truly don’t know how common it is in Britain. I personally don’t know of anyone who’s ever had to; there was one girl in my year who (somehow) failed her OWL-equivalents, but they didn’t hold her back to repeat the year, she just had to revise them alongside her sixth-year classes and retake them. Harry also decides that Marcus looks like he has troll blood in him. Such a lovely boy you are, Harry. Kindly fuck off.

Commentary for the match is provided by Lee Jordan, friend of the Terrible Twins. Why a biased fourteen year old is the commentator will never be explained, but credit where it’s due, it’s actually pretty well written. I don’t find sports commentary interesting, but it’s done well here. A little too well, given Lee’s age, but okay. We’re also not told how he’s doing it, incidentally; the wizarding world is more Muggle-savvy here than in later books but they certainly don’t have microphones, and Rowling hasn’t invented the spell Ludo Bagman uses in book four yet. Maybe he just shouts really, really loudly.

Highlights from the match commentary:

  • Lee takes the chance to ‘compliment’ Angelina’s looks. By itself the comment isn’t that bad, but I have issues with him doing so in front of the entire school when there’s no possible way she can object. At least McGonagall scolds him for it, but this isn’t the last time he’ll do it. There’s at least one match in a later book where he’ll complain within earshot of the whole school that she won’t go out with him no matter how often he says she’s pretty, which is skeevy on multiple levels. (Let’s not mince words about this, this is sexual harassment and Rowling really shouldn’t be treating it as a cute character quirk.)
  • He also compliments Flint, surprisingly, mentioning him ‘flying like an eagle‘. At least, I think it’s meant to be a compliment…
  • Alicia Spinnet was apparently ‘a reserve‘ last year. So the houses do have reserve teams? This will never be mentioned again, not even in the year where Harry’s the captain. And if they do, why did Gryffindor not have a seeker this year? Did both their former seeker and the reserve seeker graduate, and is nobody else in the house capable? What were they going to do if McGonagall hadn’t broken the rules to get Harry on the team, go without and lose every match? (As if.)
  • Katie gets hit in the back of the head with a bludger. Lee astutely points out that this must have hurt. She drops the quaffle, but according to the narrative doesn’t also fall off her broom and smack into the ground with a fractured skull to later die of severe brain damage, or just die instantly as her head explodes. She’s only a second year at this point, so this is her first-ever match as well since she’s not a special snowflake, and she’s already sustained a life-threatening injury. I’d find another hobby, love. (We’ve deduced that Katie Bell must be a second-year here given that she’s older than Harry and still at Hogwarts in book six. This is never acknowledged anywhere; I honestly don’t think Rowling had decided on ages for the rest of the Gryffindor team at this point.)

I suppose we ought to let ourselves be sidetracked again for a minute: let’s talk about head injuries.

Head injuries in Fantasyland are bewilderingly common. Being hit on the head is a commonly abused plot device – it provides a narratively convenient way of knocking a character out to kidnap them or move them somewhere quickly or prevent them doing something stupid. Sometimes the character gets to stay conscious but be a bit dizzy and out of it enough to say something they shouldn’t have for the convenience of other characters or to generate quick drama. For authors who write visually it’s a good descriptive injury, as well, particularly for authors who know/hope their work will be adapted to the screen in some form or another – head injuries provide dramatic bleeding and distinctive visible bruises.

And yet, when’s the last time you read anything where there were actual physical consequences? Head injuries are serious. If you’ve hit someone hard enough to knock them out, you’ve caused some internal damage. There are no actual nerves in the brain, so beyond a headache many people have no idea there’s anything wrong until suddenly days or even weeks later they drop dead. Your skull is relatively tough, since it’s designed to protect your brain, but there are weak points and it was never intended to withstand sudden impacts, and the brain itself is fragile and full of lots and lots of very important things that shouldn’t be shaken up too much.

In the real world if someone gets hit hard in the head, there are a lot of potentially fatal consequences. A fractured or cracked skull. Damage to the spine where head and neck join, with added nerve damage. Internal bleeding. Swelling of the brain. Water on the brain. Blood clots. Damage to the eyes, ears and/or nose. Damage to the mouth possibly including partial amputation of the tongue.

And of course concussion, that not very well understood term that authors usually get wrong. Mild concussion isn’t too serious, it’s the movie version – you feel dizzy, your vision goes a bit weird, you’re a bit confused and can’t focus on things properly, you may even throw up, and then you’re okay. A serious head injury will cause a correspondingly serious concussion, which is much less fun and can screw you up for months, perhaps longer, if it doesn’t simply kill you.

And that’s all just from the initial injury, not taking into account the possibility of brain damage. Think about it; your brain controls everything. Damaging part of it is catastrophic. You could lose one or more of your senses, the ability to walk or speak, your understanding of time or language, your visual memory. You can develop serious mental, physical and emotional disorders. If you’re lucky, the effects may wear off over years, or may be partially countered with therapy. Brain tissue doesn’t heal – any damage is permanent, and whether other areas of your brain are able to learn to compensate for the damaged parts or not is pretty much down to chance.

Let’s not forget memory loss, another favoured plot device. In fiction, memory loss can be funny or it can be frustrating, and occasionally it’s briefly angsty, and then it fixes itself. In the real world, it’s horrifically traumatic and very upsetting, it tears people apart and literally ruins lives, and it may or may not get better.

My favourite example of Fantasyland misusing head injuries comes from A Song of Ice and Fire; at one point Sandor Clegane uses the flat of his battleaxe to smack Arya Stark over the head so he can kidnap her before she gets herself killed. A full grown very muscular warrior smashes a ten year old girl in the head with a gigantic war axe. And she’s fine when she wakes up, she barely has a headache. Shame on you, George. Shame.

This issue isn’t restricted to Fantasyland, of course; plenty of other genres use convenient unconsciousness, particularly crime/spy/action thrillers and so on. But most of what I read is fantasy in one form or another, so that’s generally what I talk about.

In conclusion, don’t use head injuries as plot devices, and certainly don’t use them for comedy. Do your research.

I will now hand you over to Mitchell to discuss real-world brain injuries in sport.

[Mitchell here.] I actually find it odd that I feel so compelled to discuss this subject, mostly because I personally have almost no interest in sport at all. But it’s an issue that doesn’t receive as much exposure as it ought, and the cavalier way Rowling treats it strikes me as an exaggeration of a lot of problematic real-world attitudes.

Let’s take American football, for example; in the last couple of years there’s been a lot of research coming out about the long-term brain damage players have been subjected to (a very high instance of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, which is more usually associated with boxers; according to this article a study found it affected “96 percent of NFL players that they had examined and in 79 percent of all football players”, for instance).  And the cause isn’t so much a few high-impact collisions, as very frequent minor ones.  From what I understand it’s also been found that it’s much worse in American football than, for instance, rugby, in part because (somewhat counterintuitively) the protective gear and helmets make players more comfortable hitting harder and, e.g., ramming into each other headfirst. Add to this the fact players of American football tend to be more heavily built and the armour adds even more weight, and these players are building up a lot more momentum before crashing into one another.

Similar problems have been observed with players of European football, (what Americans call soccer), from players ‘heading’ the ball and such. I’d be curious to know whether it’s also present in sports like, for example, hockey, where high-speed collisions also occur but don’t necessarily involve the players’ heads directly…

I find it’s really a rather thorny issue and while there is definitely research being done into improving helmets and other safety equipment, I find society as a whole tends to turn a blind eye to this because the sports themselves are so popular as entertainment. I personally am reminded of nothing so much as gladiatorial combat, especially when you consider that many players come from disadvantaged backgrounds and may see the game(s) as their only means of advancement in society. That is not conducive to informed consent (and in any event studies have found players not to be well-informed about the risks). I never particularly cared for American football, but knowing about things like this I can’t stand to watch it at all.

That said, I bring this up here because Quidditch as depicted is even more violent and dangerous than this, is played with no protective equipment whatsoever, and is presented as consequence-free. If people are sustaining severe concussions and long-term brain injury from heading a football, or just from running into each other repeatedly, I don’t think I need to stress what would likely happen to people hit in the head by flying self-propelled cannonballs. Or involved in aerial collisions on broomsticks (even disregarding the possibility of being stabbed with said sticks). Et cetera. Some of this can perhaps be excused in that the conclusive research is fairly new (or at least only recently coming to light), but it’s not as though we only recently discovered head injuries were dangerous.

I apologise for going on at length about this because it’s only tangentially related really, but as Loten said above way too many fictional works treat head injuries cavalierly and this is just yet another manifestation of that. I’m not sure how harmful I really think it is, broadly speaking – there’s an extent to which people probably do realise that fiction is inaccurate about this, but it’s probably still a bad idea to perpetuate misconceptions about how dangerous they really are.

We now return you to your usual programme. Whether you like it or not.

Back with the plot, Hagrid joins the Gryffindor kids in the stadium at this point, for whatever reason. He’s managed to find binoculars that fit his hands and face, so his arbitrary size-changing doesn’t seem to be happening at the moment. He thinks it’s an achievement for Harry to have avoided trouble for the ten minutes or so that he’s been playing; this is a terrifying game. Harry supports this by describing one of the bludgers as ‘more like a cannon ball than anything‘.

Yet another side-track; in ‘real’ Quidditch, the beaters are armed with dodgeballs, and when you’re hit you’re timed out for a minute or so. And the snitch is a player in yellow with a tennis ball in a sock tied to their belt, and the seekers have to chase them and take it off them; if they’re not caught after a certain length of time they have to have one arm tied behind their back, and after another length of time it’s both arms. The game ends once someone catches them, though it’s only worth thirty points; the role is more of a human stopwatch than anything, and really just exists to stop the game going on too long.

We have mixed feelings about this. Truthfully we both think the notion of trying to play real Quidditch is bloody silly and we can’t really see why anyone would want to, but if you accept that as a goal then this is actually a nice solution. It keeps the whimsy and eliminates the risk of horrific death/injury and the stupid gamebreaking scoring.

Anyway, back to the game. Angelina scores, and Harry does some loop-the-loops to celebrate. Not only does he not fall off his broom, but his glasses don’t fall off. Now that truly is magic. Incidentally, he’s not taking part in the game; instead he’s floating majestically above the match, just in case nobody had grasped his superior status, looking for the stupid golden flying walnut. In his defence, this is what Wood told him to do: ‘We don’t want you attacked before you have to be.’ Wood accepts that of course the seeker is going to be attacked, that’s how this game works (and his brilliant strategy for his new seeker boils down to ‘try not to die’). Given how valuable Harry is as the Chosen One, why on earth did Dumbledore allow him to play?

More proof that wizards aren’t anti-Muggle in this book: Hooch has her whistle, and one of the Terrible Twins is wearing a wristwatch (Harry sees the sun reflecting gold from it and thinks it might be the flying walnut).

Eventually Harry does see the walnut, and so does Terence Higgs, the Slytherin seeker. They both charge towards it, and Flint ‘blocks‘ Harry. I had to re-read this scene to figure out what’s going on, because blocking someone is a perfectly normal sporting move but everyone went mad screaming about cheating and fouling; Flint actually deliberately crashed into Harry, which is not what ‘blocking’ means, Rowling. Of course, every single other player stopped what they were doing to watch the amazing snowflake chasing his walnut around, because they all know that scoring goals is utterly meaningless and if he catches the damn thing they can all go inside for a hot drink.

Lots of whining about Flint cheating, and the match resumes with a penalty to Gryffindor, since Terence missed the walnut in all the confusion and now it’s flown off somewhere again. No, really, getting in the seeker’s way ought to be something all the players regularly do, and honestly I can’t imagine there’s ever a full game without people colliding in mid-air.

Presumably as narrative punishment, Marcus gets hit ‘hard‘ in the face with a bludger during the next paragraph. We’ve talked this subject to death during this post; let’s just acknowledge that it’s stupid and move on.

Harry’s broom starts doing weird things at this point, as he dodges a bludger ‘spinning dangerously past his head‘; it lurches and twitches and acts like it’s trying to buck him off, leaving him panicking about falling off. I have problems picturing this scene – he’s hanging onto the broom with his hands and knees? How is he using his knees, he’s sitting on a stick that’s right up in his crotch. Rowling seems to be confusing it with a horse. And of course we have no idea how brooms are usually controlled anyway, so we have no frame of reference for how strange or scary this is or whether he’s taking the right actions or not.

It starts zig-zagging wildly around and making violent swishing movements, and now people are starting to notice (everyone was already watching him chase the walnut, but somehow didn’t see the broom bucking until this point). Hagrid says it looks like he’s lost control of the broom, but that’s apparently impossible for reasons he won’t say. Then it starts rolling over and over, and more people are noticing and pointing; it jerks really violently and Harry falls off, and is now only holding on with one hand. Seamus wonders if something happened to the broom when Flint hit it. I’m wondering how the broom is stilll flying given that its rider isn’t sitting on it any more; I would have thought the first thing anyone would do is build a stop function into the damned things so if the rider falls off it doesn’t fly off into the sunset without them.

Two things I would like to mention here. One – every single person, Harry included, is assuming that this is the broom malfunctioning. Hermione is the only person to think that another human might be doing it deliberately; everyone else thinks it’s perfectly normal for sticks to go crazy and have seizures. Given that she’s Muggleborn (and that Harry’s an idiot) and everyone else commenting is wizard-raised, it’s possible they’re right and that this does happen often enough to not be that remarkable. Just in case this game wasn’t lethal enough already.

We could even take this a step further, given how many things in the wizarding world display a worrying level of sentience and ability to go horribly wrong. It’s entirely possible that magic in this world is actually wild and unpredictable, and only Muggle-raised practitioners assume it can be controlled. Maybe the default state of this universe is batshit chaos. Honestly, that would explain a lot.

The second thing I want to mention at this point is that nobody takes any action whatsoever. Harry’s in serious danger of falling off. None of his team mates fly closer to try to help/get ready to catch him. None of them ask Hooch to call for a time-out. None of the teachers in the crowd are trying to intervene (except one, as we know). Everyone’s just letting it happen. Lee’s not even commenting on it. I personally find this hilarious, honestly, especially in the film where you get to physically see them all just not giving a fuck.

Anyway, Hagrid says only ‘powerful Dark Magic‘ can interfere with a broom.

  • How does he know that?
  • How do you make a stick insanely magic-proof?
  • What does ‘dark magic’ even mean in this universe?

None of these questions will ever be answered. We’ll also never learn how our villain jinxed the broom in the first place, or why. This is the least effective way to hurt a Quidditch player ever – if it was us we’d have greased the damned thing so he fell off naturally, or just plain set it on fire. Or done nothing and let Nature take its course, given how messed up this ‘sport’ is. Dobby’s insane bludger plan next book is 100% more effective than this. The crazy idiot house elf who’s actually on Team Harry is a better villain than the man actively trying to murder him here. Go figure.

Hermione, trying to be a small spark of sanity in this batshit world, assumes that no, sticks can’t do this on a whim, someone must be doing it. She borrows Ron’s binoculars and starts looking at the crowd for someone acting suspiciously. Because the plot demands it, the first possibility she sees is Snape, who’s watching Harry with his lips moving. Like every other person in the crowd who’s watching Harry and talking about what the hell is wrong with his broom. But no, authorial fiat declares that this particular person is suspicious, so Hermione doesn’t keep looking for additional suspects – it’s fair enough, I suppose; she’s only twelve and she’s trying to help her friend, unlike everyone else at the match. It’s just so contrived that it’s irritating, and there’s no possible way she can know at this distance that he’s casting a spell and not just talking to whoever’s sitting next to him.

Continuing to be a better person than everyone else, she has not only identified the (possible) source of the problem but now goes to deal with it. Ron continues to be the worst sidekick ever by simply sitting there and watching her (and occasionally Harry) through the binoculars, just like everyone else in their little group. Seriously, this is just hilariously stupid at this point.

Harry’s broom is now ‘vibrating so hard, it was almost impossible for him to hang on much longer.’ Cough, cough. Things are getting so silly that it’s actually the Terrible Twins who finally try to help him, but the broom kicks higher every time they get near him, so they fly around underneath to catch him if he falls. Hooch continues to do nothing at all, along with every other adult in the crowd, and every other player. Except Marcus, who cheerfully grabs the quaffle and scores five times in a row because everyone’s just staring vacantly at Harry.

You know, why doesn’t he just let go at this point? He’s finally got a safety net (though admittedly not one I would trust). Let go of the stick, you idiot.

This next scene so desperately needed editing. Hermione fights her way through the crowd all the way around the stadium to get to Snape, running along the row behind him and knocking Quirrell over on the way. At this point the broom should have stopped buggering about, at least for a few seconds while he picks himself back up. It doesn’t – though I do actually like the brief mention of Quirrell here, it’s a nice bit of genuine subtlety. I’d appreciate it more if it wasn’t obvious that Rowling went back and stuck it in later instead of rewriting the scene, because clearly this is still the first draft where Snape’s still the villain.

Hermione crouches down next to Snape, who somehow doesn’t notice her. Nor does anyone else sitting near them. She calls up her blue fire again and sets fire to his robe.

Spell count: Hermione, 6. Ron, 1. Harry, 0.

It somehow takes thirty seconds for Snape to notice he’s on fire. Which is more than enough time for Quirrell to have sat up again and continued what he was doing; I suppose we have to assume he hit his head or something (there’s a lot of that going around, after all). There’s been no description of who else is sitting here, but whoever it is, they don’t notice the fire either. Snape also continues not to notice Hermione right next to him; she doesn’t move until she hears him yelp, when she calmly scoops the fire off his robe and into a jar in her pocket (somehow) and walks away from his seat and makes her way back to the others on the opposite side of the stadium. Which he apparently also doesn’t see.

Spell count: Hermione, 7 (unless she’s wearing asbestos gloves). Ron, 1. Harry, 0. This is getting rather silly, isn’t it?

The only possible explanation here is that Snape is perfectly aware of what’s going on and is continuing to follow Dumbles’ sadistic and inexplicable order to take the blame. Because otherwise he could just walk a few seats down and punch Quirrell in the mouth, or Stun him, or something (or even just distract him by forcing him into conversation). Unless he thought Harry would fall off if he stopped what he was doing even for a few seconds, hence him making no attempt to stop Hermione. This is such an Idiot Plot.

Don’t you just love that he and Hermione are the only characters actually trying to do something? Hermione’s just trying to be a good friend with faulty information, but Snape is meant to be super-evil and villainous. Once again I point out that all the other teachers are at this match watching and are doing precisely sweet Fanny Adams.

The movie did this scene so much better. Hermione got under the seats so nobody would see her. She used regular fire, not her super-obvious easy-to-identify signature blue fire. She got the fuck out of there without waiting to see what happened. Someone else told Snape he was on fire, breaking his (much more obvious) state of deep concentration. While he was attempting to stamp out the fire, which is an understandable human reaction even if you do have a magic wand, Quirrell gets knocked over. (Alternatively, Snape took the opportunity to ‘accidentally’ hit Quirrell.) The broom recovers, but because all the events happened so close together there’s no way of saying which particular thing fixed it, and Quirrell is now under observation and can’t start doing it again.

I’m planning to do a post about the movie once we’re done with this book. I think we’re going to end up concluding that it’s a lot better than the book, which is… really not the conclusion I expected to come to.

Anyway, Harry’s able to get back on his broom now. I suppose we could slightly handwave it as him being too stupid (or, more charitably, too scared) to realise that the broom’s not trying to kill him any more for a little while after it actually stops.

Ron remembers he’s in this scene and tells Neville it’s safe to look now. Apparently Neville’s spent the last five minutes crying into Hagrid’s coat. I’m choosing to read this as Neville being triggered into a flashback of when his broom went haywire and tried to kill him, even though that’s clearly reading waaaaaay against authorial intent and even though there’s no reason a broken wrist would create post-traumatic stress given everything else that’s happened to him. He’s probably extremely acrophobic after being thrown out of windows and dangled at heights, so his first time on a broom would have been terrifying even if he hadn’t ended up falling twenty feet. Rowling ironically writes very good post-traumatic stress by accident when she’s trying to say something else.

‘Harry was speeding towards the ground when the crowd saw him clap his hand to his mouth as though he was about to be sick – he hit the pitch on all fours – coughed – and something gold fell into his hand.
‘I’ve got the Snitch!’ he shouted, waving it above his head, and the game ended in complete confusion.’

Try to picture this happening. It sounds like Harry caught the walnut in his hand and then put it in his mouth to me. And how did he manage to land on all fours when he’s got a broom between his legs? I’m pretty sure that would have prevented him ever reaching puberty (which could have seriously improved a lot about the later books). Not to mention that landing on all fours is a good way to shatter your limbs, since there’s no indication that he then rolled over or did anything else sensible.

More to the point, remember that the walnut has wings? In the films, they’re metal. Catching that in your mouth would give you some horrific Joker scars. Even assuming they’re not made of metal in book-canon (why would we assume wizards would do anything to make an object safer, though?) it would still hurt.

If Rowling really wanted him to catch it in his mouth for whatever stupid reason (we know she hadn’t thought of the ‘I open at the close’ thing at this point, there’s been no mention that snitches are one-use-only) she could have salvaged this by just having Harry fall off the damned broom. He’s screaming, his mouth is wide open. The snitch – which does not have wings – is as sadistic as the cannonballs, and flies into his mouth. Done.

There ought to be a scene break here, since we jump to twenty minutes after the match at this point. Marcus is arguing that almost swallowing the walnut by accident doesn’t count as catching it; poor naive bastard. Unsurprisingly, nobody’s listening to him. Gryffindor won by over a hundred points, because apparently when Marcus started scoring goals totally unopposed he got bored after five and decided not to keep doing it until he reached a score where catching the walnut wouldn’t be enough? If he’d kept going he could have won the match, and it would be totally legal since the referee didn’t stop play to help the young boy in danger.

It’s fun to imagine the Slytherin chasers just sitting either side of one of the goals idly throwing the quaffle back and forth through the hoop for five minutes while all this is happening.

Harry, Ron and Hermione are in Hagrid’s hut drinking tea; Seamus, Dean and Neville are no longer deemed worthy of witnessing the plot and have vanished. (It’s a good point, though. They all heard Hermione say it was Snape; they all watched her dealing with it. Then what? They decided they didn’t actually give a fuck and wandered off? Wait, that actually makes sense, never mind.)

Ron explains everything to Harry, and makes it sound like he was involved in it instead of sitting watching Hermione do it. She keeps silent – maybe she’s starting to realise things aren’t making sense and is trying to think it through. It’s all news to Hagrid, even though he was sitting right next to them at the time, and he says it’s rubbish and asks why Snape would do that.

Harry says he found out Snape was trying to get past the three-headed dog at Halloween (so Snape must have wanted to silence him). Hagrid is shocked that they know about Fluffy, to the surprise of the Trio who understandably hadn’t guessed that was the monster’s name; it turns out Fluffy belongs to Hagrid. He bought him off a Greek man he met in a pub. I really like the detail that the cerberus’ owner was Greek, that’s a nice touch.

Hagrid lent Fluffy to Dumbledore to guard the – and he’s about to say it, when Harry interrupts with ‘Yes?‘ at which point Hagrid shuts up. You’re an idiot, Harry. If you’d just let him finish the sentence this would have been over quicker. Hagrid being unable to keep secrets actually works here: he doesn’t see much of most students, most people seem to see him as a dumb animal, he’s probably very lonely and has lost the habit of guarding his speech. The part where it falls down is expecting us to keep swallowing it for the entire series; there’s no handwave, he’s just an utter moron, or being mind-controlled by Dumbles.

Anyway, Harry insists Snape’s trying to steal whatever the object is, and Hagrid repeats that it’s rubbish. Hermione asks, why did he try to kill Harry then? She’s read all about jinxes, and that’s what Snape was doing because he was keeping eye contact and not blinking.

Looking at someone and keeping eye contact with them isn’t the same thing. Also, eye contact will never ever matter for another spell again in the rest of the series (well, excepting Legilimency, but that’s something radically different). And curse and jinx, and later hex, will all be used interchangeably with no attempt to explain what they mean and whether there’s a difference. Besides, if Hermione’s read that about curses, she should also have read that it applies to counter-curses as well.

‘I’m tellin’ yeh, yer wrong!’ said Hagrid hotly. ‘I don’ know why Harry’s broom acted like that, but Snape wouldn’ try an’ kill a student!’

‘Unlike a worryingly high number of your other teachers!’

(Incidentally, Hagrid keeps referring to him as Snape, not Professor Snape, which is totally out of character for him.)

He tells them to keep out of it, that what’s going on is between Dumbledore and Nicholas Flamel. Harry literally says ‘Aha!‘ at this point, which I really didn’t think people actually did, and Rowling gets bored and randomly ends the chapter in mid-sentence with ‘Hagrid looked furious with himself.‘ I feel that should have ended with ‘and refused to say anything else’ or ‘and changed the subject’ or ‘and abruptly said it was time for them to go back to the castle’.

Well, wasn’t that fun. This is probably the worst chapter we’ve covered so far, except perhaps the ones involving horrific child abuse, because it’s just such a mess. The whole thing is a tangle of continuity errors and reads like a very early draft in chronic need of careful editing. This was the first book by a then-unknown author; I would assume Bloomsbury would have been a lot more thorough, unless they weren’t expecting it to do that well and didn’t really care. We understandably can’t find any information on whether Rowling was contracted to produce the full series at this point, or whether the first book was a trial and she was offered a contract afterwards when it did reasonably well; we do know the series didn’t really take off until around Goblet of Fire. The mid-point between early books not mattering and later books selling insanely well no matter what was probably Prisoner of Azkaban; assuming we make it that far it’ll be interesting to see how well the editing was done there (I can already think of several continuity errors, but we’ll see).

I’m not sure they even really bother editing children’s books, though. Young Adult didn’t exist as a genre at this point, and even if it had, this book and the next are both very definitely aimed at pre-teens. It’s entirely possible any publisher wouldn’t bother since they’d know their target audience wouldn’t notice or care.

In conclusion, either the author or the publishers (or both) were very lazy here and really dropped the ball. Which is a shame. Writing is hard, why bother if you’re not going to take the time to make it right? And on that note, see you next time for a full chapter of angsty!Harry several books before he should exist…


Posted by on January 19, 2016 in loten, mitchell


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

25 responses to “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone: Chapter Eleven

  1. DawnM

    January 19, 2016 at 11:06 pm

    I haven’t read the whole post yet, but I wanted to contribut this tidbit:

    From Wikipedia: ‘Moleskin is a heavy cotton fabric, woven and then sheared to create a short, soft pile on one side. In feel and appearance its nap is similar to felt or chamois, but less plush than velour. The word is also used for clothing made from this fabric, as well as adhesive pads stuck to the skin to prevent blisters. Clothing made from moleskin is noted for its softness and durability. Some variants of the cloth are so densely woven as to be windproof.”

    • DawnM

      January 19, 2016 at 11:07 pm

      Although, there’s no guarantee that JKR means one version of moleskin over the other.

      • Loten

        January 20, 2016 at 10:11 am

        Thanks for sharing, that’s pretty interesting. It wouldn’t make sense for Hagrid to be wearing either version, so I don’t suppose it matters, but it’s good to know.

  2. drashizu

    January 20, 2016 at 12:46 am

    Wow, my memory of the Quidditch scene was entirely superseded by the film version. Hermione stuck around waiting for Snape to notice he was on fire and then scooped the fire up in a jar and sauntered off, and he didn’t notice? Wow.

    I do like the repeat detail about her carrying around fire in a jar, though. It’s whimsical without being ridiculous, in the context of the general whimsy of the wizarding world so far. I would have liked to see Hermione’s blue fire stick around as a trademark of hers, for example by being her accustomed alternative to Lumos when she needs to see in the dark, but I can’t remember that it ever happens again after she uses it on the Devil’s Snare at the end of Philosopher’s Stone. The wiki calls them Bluebell Flames and apparently they’re mentioned in a few other books and are used as set dressing in the movies, but have no other canonical appearances.

    • Loten

      January 20, 2016 at 10:12 am

      Mine too, I didn’t remember it being anywhere near this stupid. I’d have liked to see the blue fire again as well.

  3. All-I-need

    January 20, 2016 at 1:27 am

    I’m not even done reading this review yet but I would just like to say that what I really really want in my life is fanart of Snape wearing a kilt. Thank you for putting that image in my head.

    • Loten

      January 20, 2016 at 10:13 am

      You’re welcome! 😛 I’m sure someone will read this eventually and be glad to oblige all of us. I think the world needs to see it.

    • sellmaeth

      January 28, 2016 at 9:18 pm

      Weren’t schoolgirls in Britain banned from wearing trousers with their uniforms up until recently? I totally buy Snape wearing nothing but underpants and stockings under his robes. ‘Tis traditional, and he’d want to be as wizardly as humanly possible, considering his past, right?

      On the other hand, especially considering his past, it would also make sense to wear very presentable trousers under his robes … ah, well, maybe he refuses to let himself be influenced by those bullies.

  4. JoWrites

    January 20, 2016 at 6:50 am

    I think the movies did really well with what they had to work with. Plus, in the later ones it would be very difficult to cut down those books into manageable movies. A part of me sometimes wishes they were more faithful to the books just to show the books’ flaws though. I don’t think I ever got this far in this book. I read the third one on after I had watched the first two movies on tv one day.

    But the movies did fix a lot of things. Like moving where they sat so that Harry and Draco weren’t screaming across the Great Hall at each other. And they made Ginny a much more likable (although, completely forgettable at the same time) character in the sixth movie. And of course because they were movies they got to cut out a whole lot of filler that just didn’t matter.

  5. mizules

    January 20, 2016 at 4:40 pm

    Yay, another update. These posts always make my day. 🙂

    In the books, the school uniforms seem to consist of simply plain black robes that are closed all the way (no or almost no buttons or clasps at the front) and that you pull over your head to dress/undress, pointy hats (which is honestly just inconvenient if the students are expected to wear them indoors), and winter cloaks. I don’t think any of the students wear trousers/skirts, dress shirts, sweaters or ties like they do in the movies. In Snape’s worst memory, nobody was suprised that he wasn’t wearing trousers, so that seems to be the norm. They wouldn’t just make the students run around without trousers for shits and giggles, so robes without trousers is apparently simply what most wizards wear. That being said, it doesn’t make that much sense for Snape to go without trousers. If you think about what happened in fifth year and the fact that he lives in a castle full of teenagers who don’t like him and could easily jinx his robes to go flying Marylin Monroe style (I’m suprised Fred and George never tried that on anybody), he would probably be very paranoid about what he wears. Personally I love the trousers-waistcoat-robe thing they did in the movies. That both looks stylish and is a lot warmer.

    This is kind of unrelated, but I feel like you’d enjoy floccinaucinihilipilificationa’s Harry Potter comics. Mostly they poke fun at all the unreasonable stuff going on in the books. They’re very funny imo. floccinaucinihilipilificationa . tumblr . com / tagged / harry-potter

    • Loten

      January 21, 2016 at 8:14 am

      Yeah, in the book universe there seems to be no uniform at all. For the sake of my sanity I’m going to assume most if not all people ignore that. And thanks for the link! I think I’ve seen a few of these linked elsewhere before.

      • JoWrites

        January 21, 2016 at 6:51 pm

        Some of them are funny, but they’d be better if she knew the cannon – like at all.

        Lol, I was just reading her the Dumbledore books and she didn’t know that Dumbledore died in book six or that he was actually a major part of book seven even though he was already dead. There are quite a few things that could have been hilarious as her seventh book and instead it is just: Dumbledore Actually nothing happens involving dumbledore in this book. ??? Like we find out that his was gay and best friends with (as well as in love with, if you can read subtext) with the wizard he was famous for imprisoning. As well as the whole coming back to talk to Harry at the end just like everyone thought he would.

        But most of her comics are like that. Like sometimes hint at funny things, but had she read the books she’d see that her jokes are falling flat.

      • mizules

        January 21, 2016 at 10:29 pm

        Maybe I should have added that these comics are funny to people who get the kind of ‘random’ humour that is popular on Tumblr. For someone who isn’t on Tumblr these comics are probably… pointless and stupid and not very funny? Honestly I should have thought about that, but I’m so used to Tumblr type humour nowadays that I forget most people aren’t.

        She must have read all of the books though and be a huge HP fan, or she wouldn’t spend so much time drawing Harry Potter related stuff. There’s no way she doesn’t know Dumbledore died in HBP. You probably expected some deep insightful parody of the HP series, but these comics are just bit of fun and really aren’t to be taken too seriously. Sorry to disappoint you? I probably should have mentioned that originally. As for the last book, true, important things involving Dumbledore happen, but I think what she is getting at there is simply the fact that he technically doesn’t DO anything for the simple reason that he’s dead. But like I said, don’t take it too seriously. Like, at all.

  6. Sm

    January 20, 2016 at 8:44 pm

    I find movies tend to do better than the books they adapt, as long as they’re willing to actively choose to go a different way. The incredible lengths which Disney Narnia goes to to give the Narnia books some semblance of a plot, for instance. Maybe because there’s less information to trip yourself up on, maybe because there are just a lot more people involved in the process.

    I have very little to say about quidditch, but I think it’s worth throwing in a bit of praise for Stephen Fry here, who does a great job of making ‘Hagrid looked furious with himself’ sound like a fitting end to a chapter.

    Man, I really wish there were school books in which the main character doesn’t even necessarily participate in the sport but watches their friends doing it. Like, Harry magnanimously accepting that quidditch is Ron’s thing now and supporting him in that is the best the quidditch ‘arc’ ever gets.

    (Actually, now I think of it, I read Blyton’s The Naughtiest Girl Again, which was a typical boarding school story, and vaguely remember her spending a lot of time encouraging the development of other people and sitting out of lacrosse matches cheering on her team and being supportive of everyone else, who would be supportive of her in turn and everyone would appreciate everyone else’s little moment of glory, and, as a child, I really loved the feeling which that sense of unity gave the book. Harry Potter seems to be a regression.)

    • Loten

      January 21, 2016 at 8:20 am

      I tend to prefer books over films for the most part – the Hunger Games trilogy is probably the only thing so far where I’ve definitely liked the films much more. I’m only passingly familiar with the Narnia ones, haven’t seen half the films and haven’t read any of the books in many years, so I’ll take your word for that though Disney are definitely not known for improving books by adapting them! But it’s looking increasingly likely that I’ll change my stance on HP once we get to that point.

      Audible have recently obtained the HP audiobooks and I’ve started to buy them, but haven’t listened to them yet. I have a lot of respect for Mr Fry so I expect I’ll enjoy them, but good audiobook narrators are hard to find.

      Ah, Enid Blyton. Foundation of so much of my childhood and she did genuinely write some really great books. And yet, now I’m (nominally) an adult and have found out more about her, she was a rather screwed up and very unhappy woman who neglected her own children quite badly. Funny how these things work out. I wish I still had a lot of her boarding-school stories though, referring to them would come in handy for this series.

    • drashizu

      January 22, 2016 at 12:42 am

      I think I agree with you for the most part regarding books vs. movies where the movie made a conscious decision to change the book – sometimes the result is awful, but more often than not it’s at least decent as a movie, whether or not the books were decent as books. When the movie tries to follow the book it tends to fail more, perhaps because movies really should be different given they’re a different medium, or perhaps because it’s the books that are already very good that get that kind of faithful treatment, and the movie is bound not to live up to its standards from the start.

  7. Derived Absurdity

    January 23, 2016 at 4:07 am

    This might actually genuinely be one of the stupidest books ever written.

    …That’s all I got.

  8. merisoo

    January 27, 2016 at 2:01 am

    There’s very little for me to add regarding quidditch, the impracticality of the sport and its numerous injuries. I will say that I think there is a relatively easy solution that Rowling could have employed in order to make the quidditch injuries slightly less distressing. What about protection charms? Before the start of each match, Hooch could place protection spells on all of the players. This would protect them from serious injury if they were to be hit by these literal flying cannon balls. Being that she comes across as a physical education (PE) teacher it would make sense that Hooch would be skilled in protection as well as other defense type spells. Also, this would have the added benefit of 1. Making Hooch a little less useless 2. Adding an element of magic that makes sense in the context of the story 3. Showing that not EVERY adult at Hogwarts is unconcerned with the safety of the children (at least not all the time).

    Of course, you might run into the issue of exactly how long these full body protection spells last, how much physical force they can actually handle, and would repeated hits by a bludger cause the spell to stop working? Also, since quidditch is such a prevalent sport (and the only sport) in the wizarding world, are there spells that have been created/tailored specifically for sports players and their protection? If so, this would have been actual good information to include in the quidditch book Hermione had. It also provides a good reason for Harry to want to borrow it from Hermione (since we know both him and Ron are allergic to any type of academic-type work). Being that Harry is a first year, has never played the game before and is anxious, it would make sense that he would be interested in this. Obviously, more thought needs to go into this, but seeing as Rowling is a lazy writer, this seems like a relatively simple solution that she could have employed.

    One last thing regarding the amount of locations in the wizarding world. It always disconcerted me for some reason that Diagon Alley, Hogwarts, Hogsmeade and the Weasley Burrow seemed like the only ‘real’ locations. I can’t imagine the wizarding world being that incredibly small. It makes it all feel so underdeveloped and just, gahhh I don’t know how to describe it except that it leaves me with the feeling that there should be MORE. Oh, well.

    • Loten

      January 27, 2016 at 8:21 am

      Of course, protection spells would have been the perfect sensible solution. That’s why Rowling never did it. 😛

      As for the locations, yes, very good point. Though the original concept in this book seems to be that most wizards live unnoticed in the Muggle world in setups like the future Grimmauld Place, so aside from the school and a couple of shopping enclaves they didn’t need any other locations. Except Rowling’s already forgetting that, since the only purebloods we see are utterly ignorant – yet Ron still owns/refers to the odd Muggle product because what is consistency – and as we know by next book she’ll have decided actually most wizards live completely separately in places she never bothered to invent and haven’t got a clue.

      Alternatively, since Harry’s a self-absorbed little git, he only pays attention to the existence of areas he visits personally. That’s giving Rowling too much credit, but it’s also perfectly plausible, since seriously this kid /never/ asks questions about /anything/.

  9. sellmaeth

    January 28, 2016 at 9:24 pm

    Okay, not yet read the whole review, but as for Hermione doing Harry’s homework and the teachers not noticing anything – Hermione is a genius, OF COURSE she’d imitate Harry’s style and make the homework just bad enough to be believable.
    It’s my headcanon that Hermione would be a terrible, terrifying villain if she was not such a good person and stickler for rules. Or maybe that’s canon, I mean, remember what she did to the traitor in Dumbledores Army? There’s a large untapped capacity for evil, of the evil genius type, if you ask me. Grindelwald and Voldemort would be nothing against her – for she would do evil in a CLEVER way.

    • janach

      January 29, 2016 at 5:33 am

      Untapped capacity for evil? Tapped, you mean. Decidedly tapped. As for her adherence to rules: Hermione will brush aside any rule, law, or moral principle if she has a good enough reason. And she can ALWAYS find a good reason. Just let her think about it for a minute and she’ll scrape one up.

    • liminal fruitbat

      January 29, 2016 at 12:43 pm

      “Would be”?

  10. janach

    January 31, 2016 at 5:27 am

    “In a house containing students saddled with… Alecto…”

    We’re never told in the actual books what House Alecto and Amycus belong to. Of course we are expected to assume they were Slytherins because they’re evil, but I prefer to believe they they belonged to Gryffindor, House of Crude Bullies, or Hufflepuff, House of Dull Minions, rather than Slytherin, House of Devious Sneaks. We know we can rule out Ravenclaw, House of Boring Swots.

    I don’t care what Pottermore says about them. Pottermore also insists Umbridge, the epitome of Evil Loyalty, is a Slytherin rather than a Hufflepuff. Pottermore can go hang.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: